Showing posts with label Hunger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hunger. Show all posts

Friday, April 17, 2009

But are agricultural ministers, who usually see their job as helping their own farmers, up to the task?

TO BE NOTED: From the FT:

"
The world must feed its hungry

Published: April 16 2009 19:48 | Last updated: April 16 2009 19:48

As we agonise about the recession, we should remember that humanity’s greatest economic problem is more basic: how to get enough food, a challenge still faced by millions.

This weekend the Group of Eight leading countries gathers in Italy for its first ever meeting of agriculture ministers. Their goal must be to move food policy up the global political agenda to a position where it is treated as the vital international security matter it is.

Last year’s record-high food commodity prices sparked riots as 100m people needed help from the World Food Programme. Thousands of desperate people in dozens of countries took to the streets in upheavals potentially far more destabilising than any reactions the financial meltdown has yet provoked. This danger will not go away.

Prices have come down, but remain higher than in decades. Even short disruptions cast long shadows: malnutrition in infancy can permanently impair children’s physical and cognitive development. Climate change, decades of declining investment in agriculture, and current policy mistakes conspire to make the crisis structural.

All countries share an interest in food security – their own, and for the sake of stability, that of others. But they must not confuse security with self-sufficiency. The world can produce enough food for all: as the economist Amartya Sen points out, famines are caused not by lack of food but by income inequality. The poor must get help – in ways that do not undermine food production.

Food exporters and importers alike need well-functioning international markets in food, which encourage efficient global production patterns. The responses to the crisis, sadly, have been in the opposite direction: export bans, land grabs of arable territory and secretive bilateral barter deals. These policies must stop. They are self-destructive and costly, and for poor countries ruinous. They do harm to others, as they undermine trading systems that benefit all.

Governments must provide global public goods. Research is needed to boost productivity, especially for African crops, and must not be hampered by opposition to genetically modified food. Mechanisms must be found to hedge against price volatility that discourages production even when prices are high.

The G8 has rightly invited important emerging countries to the table. But are agricultural ministers, who usually see their job as helping their own farmers, up to the task? Food security is the greatest threat to human well-being today. It should not be lost in quibbles about the branding of Parma ham.

Sunday, December 21, 2008

"Yet the good news shows that we will lose the battle against poverty and misery only if we give up "

Jeffrey Sachs with some good news in the Guardian:

"
Good news in bad times

"Let's celebrate the global successes in fighting poverty, disease and hunger

At a time when the headlines are filled with financial crises and violence, it is especially important to recognise the creativity of many governments in fighting poverty, disease and hunger( GOOD IDEA ). The point is not merely to make ourselves feel a little better, but rather to confront one of the world's gravest threats: the widespread pessimism( IT MIGHT BE REALISM, BUT, YOU'RE RIGHT, WE SHOULD TRY, IN ANY CASE ) that today's problems are too big to be solved. Studying the successes gives us the knowledge and confidence to step up our shared efforts to solve today's great global challenges.

Hats off, first, to Mexico for pioneering the idea of "conditional cash transfers" to poor households. These transfers enable and encourage those households to invest in their children's health, nutrition and schooling.

Mexico's opportunities programme, led by the president, Felipe Calder, is now being widely emulated around Latin America. Recently, at the behest of the singers Shakira and Alejandro Sanz, and a social movement called Alas that they lead, all of Latin America's leaders have committed to step up the region's programmes for early childhood development, based on successes that have been proven to date. ( SOUNDS GOOD )

Norway, under the leadership of prime minister, Jens Stoltenberg, is maintaining its tradition of creative social and environmental leadership. The government has put together a global alliance to prevent maternal death in childbirth, investing in safe delivery and the survival of newborns. At the same time, Norway launched an innovative $1bn (£0.66bn) programme with Brazil to induce poor communities in the Amazon to end rampant deforestation. Cleverly, Norway pays out the funds to Brazil only upon proven success in avoiding deforestation, compared with an agreed baseline.( GOOD IDEAS )

Spain, under the leadership of the prime minister, José Luis Rodríguez-Zapatero, has given a major stimulus to helping the poorest countries to achieve the UN millennium development goals (MDGs). Spain created a new MDG fund at the United Nations to promote the co-operation needed within the UN to address the various challenges of the MDGs. ( WORTH A SHOT )

The Spanish government rightly proposed that true solutions to poverty required simultaneous investments in health, education, agriculture and infrastructure, and then the Spanish put up the funds to help make that integrated vision a practical reality. Spain will host a meeting in January to launch a new fight against global hunger. Once again, Spain is proposing practical and innovative means to move from talk to action, specifically to help impoverished peasant farmers to get the tools, seeds and fertiliser they need to increase their farm productivity, incomes and food security. ( WE NEED TO SEE IF THEY WORK. IF SO, FINE )

The Australian prime minister, Kevin Rudd, has similarly surged to the forefront of global problem solving, putting forward a bold action plan on climate change and proposing new and practical( A KEY CONCEPT ) means to address the MDGs. Australia put real money on the table for increased food production, along the lines that Spain is proposing. It also champions an increased programme of action for the poor and environmentally threatened island economies of the Pacific region.( FINE )

These efforts have been matched by actions in the poorest countries. The landlocked and impoverished country of Malawi, under the leadership of President Bingu wa Mutharika, has doubled its annual food production since 2005 through a pioneering effort to help its poorest farmers. The programme has been so successful that it is being emulated across Africa( GOOD ).

Mali's government, under President Amadou Toumani Touré, has recently put forward a bold challenge to the world community. Mali is eager to scale up investments in agriculture, health, education and infrastructure in its 166 poorest communities. The plans are detailed, thoughtful, credible and based on proven successes that the government has already achieved. The rich world has promised to help Mali, and now Mali has led the way with its creativity( GOOD FOR THEM ).

There are countless more cases that can be mentioned. The European Union has launched a €1bn (£0.93bn) effort to help peasant farmers. The Gates Foundation, Unicef, Rotary International and many governments have succeeded in bringing down polio deaths to one-thousandth of the rate a generation ago, bringing the disease to the verge of eradication. Similar efforts are under way on many other fronts: the control of worm infections and leprosy, and a major global effort to bring malaria deaths nearly to zero by 2015.( VERY GOOD )

All of these successes, and many more, share a similar pattern. They address a well-defined( KEY ) and serious challenge, for example, low food production or a specific disease, and are based on a well-defined( KEY ) set of solutions, such as the supply of agricultural equipment and inputs needed by peasant farmers or immunisations.

Small-scale demonstration projects prove how success can be achieved; the challenge then becomes taking the solutions "to scale" in nationwide or even worldwide programmes ( TRUE ). Leadership is needed within the countries in need as well as among the rich nations that can help to launch and finance the solutions. Finally, modest amounts of money, directed at practical problem solving, can make an historic difference( I'M FOR IT IF IT'S ASSESSED FOR SUCCESS ).

Bad news can crowd out good news, especially in times of serious financial crisis and political unrest. Yet the good news shows that we will lose the battle against poverty and misery only if we give up and fail to heed the intelligence and goodwill that can be mobilised today. And perhaps next year, the US will rejoin the global effort with a new and remarkable force, led by a young president who has rightly told Americans and the world that "Yes, we can"."

No more about Bush. I'm begging you. I'm counting the seconds.