“Our strategy for 2009 is to gradually increase risk"

Some good news from Bloomberg:

"Dollar Rally Fizzling as Fed Triggers Risk Appetite (Update3)
By Bo Nielsen and Ye Xie

Jan. 5 (Bloomberg) -- The dollar, yen and Swiss franc may weaken this year against 2008’s biggest losers in the currency markets as the global economy starts to recover, the largest foreign-exchange strategists and investors say.

The winners will be the Brazilian real, Indonesian rupiah and Polish zloty as investors return to higher-yielding assets, according to Bloomberg News surveys. The dollar may strengthen versus the euro and Japanese yen, while dropping against the British pound.

“Our strategy for 2009 is to gradually increase risk( GOOD ),” said Maxime Tessier, head of foreign exchange in Montreal at Caisse de Depost et Placement du Quebec, which is Canada’s largest pension-fund manager, with C$155 billion ($130 billion) in assets. “A year from now, I definitely want to be on the short side on the dollar. We’ll see capital flows out of the U.S. again( WE'LL BE PAYING TOO LITTLE INTEREST, AND THE FLIGHT TO SAFETY WILL HAVE ABATED. ).”

While the International Monetary Fund cut its 2009 growth forecast for the world economy to 2.2 percent in November from 3.9 percent, investors are growing more confident( TRUE ) as central banks lower interest rates and governments earmark trillions of dollars for fiscal stimulus( AS THE GOVERNMENT INTERVENES. GOT THAT. ). The Dollar Index that tracks the currency against six of the U.S.’s biggest trading partners fell 6 percent last month, the most since July 1985, after rising 18 percent from June to the end of November.

The dollar lost steam as the Federal Reserve cut its target rate for overnight loans between banks to as low as zero and poured $8.5 trillion into the financial system. Treasury yields fell to records last year and rates on bills dropped below zero( ZIRP ) last month for the first time as investors sought the safety( EXPLICIT GUARANTEES ) of government debt.

Survey Results

Faster economic growth will cause the dollar to weaken to 2.30 against the real from 2.3145 at the end of 2008, according to the strategist surveys. The rupiah may follow, gaining 11 percent against the dollar to 9,850 by the end of 2010, while Poland’s zloty strengthens 13 percent to 2.62 in two years, the surveys show.

The pound may strengthen 3.5 percent to $1.51 this year, while the euro will depreciate 8.4 percent to $1.28, the strategists said. The yen, last year’s best-performing major currency, will lose 10 percent to 100 yen, they said.

Lawrence Goodman, head of emerging market currency strategy at Bank of America Corp. in New York, said countries that prove better at withstanding the global slowdown should benefit as the flight to safety slows( YES ). The dollar will decline 18 percent against the real and 19.5 percent versus the zloty, he said.

Dollar Bear

“The U.S. dollar will get weaker versus emerging-market currencies,” said Mark Mobius, who oversees about $26 billion in developing-nation assets as executive chairman of Templeton Asset Management Ltd. in Singapore, in a Dec. 24 Bloomberg Television interview. “The reason why we had this weakness in emerging-market currencies is because of the rush into the U.S. Treasuries, into dollars. I don’t think that’s sustainable( I AGREE ).”

Investors see little need to hold dollar assets( THIS IS BUITER'S WORRY ) as the Fed floods the world with greenbacks, the U.S. budget deficit swells to more than $1 trillion and with the trade gap exceeding $57 billion. China cut the share of dollars in its $1.9 trillion of reserves to about 45 percent last year from more than 70 percent in 2003, Deutsche Bank AG in Frankfurt estimates.

U.S. efforts to fix the financial system and the stimulus package promised by President-elect Barack Obama may still support the dollar by helping the world’s biggest economy recover faster than Europe and Japan.( TRUE )

Japan Outlook

Japan’s economy will probably shrink( AN EXPORT COUNTRY ) at an annual 12.1 percent pace this quarter, the sharpest drop since 1974, after reports showed industrial production and exports posted the biggest declines on record in November, Kyohei Morita, chief Japan economist at Barclays Capital in Tokyo, said last week.

By the end of 2009, the U.S. economy will be growing at a 1.8 percent annual pace, while the euro zone will be shrinking at a 0.4 percent rate and Japan will be expanding 0.4 percent, according to Bloomberg surveys.

Deutsche Bank, the world’s biggest currency trader, is among the most bullish on the dollar( IN THE SHORT RUN ), forecasting a rally to $1.20 versus the euro, and to $1.30 against the pound, as the European Central Bank cuts its target rate to 0.75 percent this year from 2.5 percent, and the Bank of England lowers its benchmark to 0.5 percent from 2 percent.

Bank of England policy makers meet Jan. 8 and are likely to lower their target rate to 1.5 percent, according to the median estimate of 50 economists surveyed by Bloomberg. The ECB meets Jan. 15 to set borrowing costs.

U.S. Outlook

The U.S. economy will grow 1.6 percent in 2010 after contracting 2 percent this year, while the 16-member euro zone shrinks 2.5 percent in 2009 and expands 1 percent the next, according to Deutsche Bank. Treasuries due in 10 years will yield 50 basis points, or 0.5 percentage point, more than comparable German bunds by year-end, instead of about 75 basis points less currently, the bank predicts.

“Like after the Great Depression, the recession in the 1970s and the end of the Cold War, the U.S. will emerge strengthened from this crisis and our competitors won’t,” said Marc Chandler, head of currency strategy at New York-based Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. “Our policies have been very aggressive while the rest of the world has been dragging its feet.”

By year-end, the dollar will trade at $1.30 against the euro and at 100 yen, Chandler said. He predicts it will trade at $1.42 per pound.

The dollar rose to 92.96 yen at 9:16 a.m. in New York, from 91.83 yen on Jan. 2, after earlier reaching 93.57 yen, the highest level since Dec. 8. Against the euro, the dollar climbed 2.3 percent to $1.3611 from $1.3921.

Losing Bet

Selling the dollar in 2008 was a losing bet, as the Dollar Index gained 6 percent to 81.308, its first annual increase since rising 13 percent in 2005. The yen and franc also benefited from investors getting out of risky assets, with Japan’s currency appreciating 19 percent and Switzerland’s strengthening 5.7 percent versus the dollar.

The greenback’s share of foreign reserves rose in the third quarter to 64.6 percent from 63 percent at the end of June, the Washington-based IMF said Dec. 31, the biggest increase since the first three months of 2004.

Investors bought the dollar to purchase Treasuries and shield their money from credit-related losses and stock declines( EXPLICIT GUARANTEES IN A CALLING RUN ) that wiped out more than $28 trillion from equity markets. Writedowns and losses at the world’s largest financial institutions since the start of 2007 total $1 trillion, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

‘Turning the Economy’

The biggest beneficiary was the yen, as the retreat from risk caused investors to unwind carry trades and buy back the Japanese currency that financed purchases of higher-yielding assets. The search for higher yields may trigger demand for the Australian and New Zealand dollars as money managers take advantage of central bank rates more than 4 percentage points higher than in Japan( TRUE ).

The Australian dollar, which weakened 20 percent against the U.S. dollar last year, depreciated 35 percent in 2008 to 63.67 yen. New Zealand’s dollar fell 39 percent to 52.53 yen.

Emerging markets were among the biggest losers last year as the MSCI EM Index fell 54.5 percent.

“If the governments are successful turning the economy, ironically, that will come along with a very weaker dollar,” said Chirag Gandhi, a money manager of a $2.5 billion global fixed-income fund at the Investment Board of State of Wisconsin in Madison, Wisconsin.

‘Signs of Bottoming’

Developing economies will grow 3.1 percent in 2009, following a 5.9 percent gain last year, while developed countries, including the U.S., the euro area and Japan, will contract 1.4 percent after expanding 0.9 percent in 2008, the Institute of International Finance said in its forecast released Dec. 18 in Washington. The group represents the world’s largest commercial and investment banks.

The currencies of Poland, Brazil and Indonesia will be among the best performers, Bank of America’s Goodman said. The zloty will strengthen to 2.39 per dollar by the end of June after dropping 21 percent. The real will surge to 1.90 after plummeting 30 percent and the rupiah will trade at 10,000 by the end of September, Goodman wrote.

Emerging-market bonds are starting to draw investors( GOOD NEWS ). The extra yield they demand to own the debt instead of Treasuries fell to 6.94 percentage points from 8.62 percentage points in October, according to JPMorgan’s EMBI+ Index.

“If we see some signs of bottoming, then the extreme risk aversion will start to mitigate( I AGREE ),” said Robert Kowit, who manages $3 billion of global bonds at Federated Investors Inc. in Pittsburgh. “At that point, we’ll be left with a huge amount of the dollars that have been printed and a huge amount of debt to be issued and bought.”( VERY TRUE )

We are seeing signs of a diminution in the fear and aversion to risk. How fast will this diminution occur?

"The world’s foreign exchanges were today readying themselves for parity between sterling and the euro"

Another good EconomPic Data post:

"Euro Approaching Parity with Pound Sterling

Guardian (hat tip Credit Writedowns):

The world’s foreign exchanges were today readying themselves for parity between sterling and the euro after further selling sent the pound to within touching distance of a one-for-one exchange rate against the European currency.

The euro has risen by almost a third against the pound in the course of 2008, with an 18% appreciation in December alone. Sterling’s trade-weighted index against a basket of currencies fell to 74.2% of its 2005 value, its lowest since the Bank of England first kept daily records in 1990.

"if they start to view the pound as Europe’s equivalent of an Agency bond …"

Brad Setser on the wild ride of the dollar recently:

"Only a few days ago, so it seems, it took about $1.25 to buy a euro. Now it takes closer to $1.45 (it was more earlier today, but the dollar subsequently rallied). And — as Macro Man notes — the dollar’s move pales relative to the recent slide in the pound. Not so long ago a pound bought 1.5 euros. Now it buys a euro and change. The Anglo-Saxon currencies haven’t had a good two week run.

Both the US and the UK ( 1 ) had housing and finance centric economies. Both have ( 2 ) significant external deficits. And both are ( 3 ) inclined to use monetary and fiscal policy aggressively to combat a downturn.

But with global trade collapsing, the euro’s rise can not be all that comfortable for members of the eurozone. It isn’t clear that any one wants a stronger currency right now ( THIS MEANS THAT THEIR EXPORTS WILL BE MORE EXPENSIVE IN OTHER COUNTRIES, AND THEY DON'T WANT TO LOSE EXPORT BUSINESS DURING AN ECONOMIC DOWNTURN ). Currencies though are relative prices — and can go up or down amid a global contraction. In theory, everyone could ease monetary policy equally without changing the relative value of any currencies ( THIS WOULD KEEP THE DOLLAR HIGHER ). In practice things rarely work out as neatly ( EXACTLY ).

Dr. Krugman, I would assume, hopes that the euro’s rise puts more pressure on Germany to join a coordinated European fiscal stimulus — with good reason. Germany’s export machine relies on global and European demand. That demand is falling (watch Russian imports for example). And if the euro’s rally is sustained, Germany will soon face an additional headwind. So too will the less competitive members of the eurozone. They are in an even more difficult position if Germany doesn’t lead a coordinated European reflation. ( GERMAN EXPORTS WILL BE TOO EXPENSIVE )

Four other thoughts:

1) Until fairly recently, all the European currencies tended to move in tandem against the dollar. That meant their cross-rates were stable. And it meant that the euro wasn’t as strong as it seemed. The euro was strong against the dollar and the yen, but not against the pound, the Swedish krona, the Norwegian krona and similar currencies. Right now the euro is rising against all the smaller European currencies — not just against the dollar.

2) Japan is starting too worry about yen strength, not surprising. Renewed intervention seems like a possibility if the yen continues to rise. That shouldn’t be a surprise. Japan tends to intervene heavily when the interest different between the yen and dollar goes away, reducing private market demand for dollars.

3) China has to be pleased by the euro’s rally. Dollar strength translated into RMB strength — and a rising RMB when Chinese exports were slowing (and likely now falling) made Chinese policy makers uncomfortable. There was even talk of moving to a real basket peg — which would have meant that RMB would depreciate against the dollar when the dollar was strong. But I rather doubt that China now wants to appreciate against the dollar to offset the dollar’s renewed weakness against the euro. Right now China is happy to see the dollar and thus the RMB weaken( THAT WAY THEIR EXPORTS DON'T GET MORE EXPENSIVE FOR US ) …

4) Central banks have been big buyers of the pound over the past few years. Reserves were growing, and the pound’s share was rising. Central banks liked its yield( PAID HIGHER INTEREST ) — and the fact that it an easy alternative to both the dollar and the euro. By my count, central bank inflows often were large enough to cover the UK’s current account deficit. Central banks reserves are shooting up, but if they “rebalance” their portfolios they should be big buyers of pounds now — as they need to hold more pounds to keep the pound’s share of their portfolio up as the pound’s value slides.

I’ll be interested to see if they do so — or if they start to view the pound as Europe’s equivalent of an Agency bond …( AND NOT BUY IT AS TOO RISKY )

Notice the Chinese Contradiction:

1) They don't want the dollar to weaken so that they can export to us

2) That's happening because we're printing money

3) Yet, they tell us not to borrow too much from them, and they don't want to spend too much

Problem: On 3, it has to be one or the other

Either we borrow more and they save more

or

we save more and they spend more

"In the US as in the UK the twin deficits (government and current account) severely constrain the government’s fiscal elbow room."

Willem Buiter with another brilliant post. It's kind of scary, actually:

"With the pound sterling dropping like a stone against most other currencies and long-term interest rates on UK sovereign debt beginning to edge up, this is a good time to revisit a suggestion I made earlier on a number of occasions (e.g. here, here and here), that there is a non-trivial risk of the UK becoming the next Iceland."

Read the post. I can't paraphrase him.

Here's my comment:

“Such mistrust in the temporary nature of a fiscal stimulus would not be irrational. After its first term in office, the government have thrown fiscal restraint to the wind and have engaged in a steady increase in public spending as a share of GDP which has been only partly matched by an increase in the tax burden as a share of GDP. Rising debt and deficits and a fondness for fiscal and accounting gimmicks designed to hide the increase in the debt burden have undermined public confidence in the fiscal rectitude of the government. With enough mistrust, the interest rates will rise by enough to crowd out completely the stimulus to private demand provided by the tax cut or public spending increase. Lack of confidence in the government’s fiscal sustainability would also undermine confidence in sterling. In the worst case, we could see a run on the banks, on the public debt and on sterling all at the same time. This is not the most likely outcome yet, in my view. But it is a distinct possibility.”

I agree with almost everything that you write, in terms of policy. In fact, I would call your writings prudential, which is high praise from me, which it is well you toss in the dustbin. But politically, we’re in a peculiarly tough position. So let me posit my foolishness.

The reaction to Lehman showed the Fed and Treasury that:
1) The markets and investors were expecting intervention.
2) These market people and investors, are very wealthy and very powerful. They told the Fed and Treasury that there’s no Plan B. If you don’t act, we’re clueless as to what course to pursue.
3) Based on earlier actions of yours, we investors, whatever we say in public about free market economics, made not irrational investments based on your intervening. If you don’t intervene now, it will not be seen as prudent and principled, but arbitrary, and arbitrary is political poison. It leads to charges of cronyism, not being principled, having no plan, and you might as well write your name in the history books as looking like a combination of Hoover and Tammany Hall.

So, the Fed and Treasury felt that they had to intervene. Once they did this, well, you can already see where I’m going.

TARP was sold in some quarters as buying toxic assets, read crap, for $700 billion, in order to save bankers. Whatever you think about that, it’s what many people understood.

Now, what about car makers? Does the word arbitrary ring a bell?

Now, you show up, after all this, and say, “Sorry. No more money. No stimulus for average citizens to get us through and out of this recession.Wish we had it. Bankers and automakers got it. Talk to them. See if they’ll share.”

I don’t see this going anywhere in the U.S. I’m not even sure China can afford to tell its citizens we can’t afford a stimulus.

So, the point you made above about mistrust and rational expectations can be made against your point of view. It cuts both ways, rather like ordinary language philosophy can be used for and against the skeptic. It is reason itself that summons the skeptic, and it is rational expectations and mistrust that summon the stimulus.

Posted by: Don the libertarian Democrat