Showing posts with label Reuters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reuters. Show all posts

Thursday, April 2, 2009

A record 32.2 million people -- one in every 10 Americans -- received food stamps at the latest count

TO BE NOTED: From Reuters:

Photo
1 of 1Full Size

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A record 32.2 million people -- one in every 10 Americans -- received food stamps at the latest count, the government said on Thursday, a reflection of the recession now in its 16th month.

Food stamps, the major U.S. anti-hunger program, help poor people buy groceries. The average benefit was $112.82 per person in January.

The January figure marks the third time in five months that enrollment set a record.

"A weakened economy means that many more individuals are turning to SNAP/Food Stamps," said the Food Research and Action Center, an anti-hunger group, using the acronym for the renamed food stamp program, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

The U.S. unemployment rate was 8.1 percent in February, the highest in 25 years. Weekly claims for jobless benefits totaled 669,000 last week, the highest in 26 years, the government said on Thursday.

Food stamp enrollment rose in 46 of the 50 states during January as the national total rose by 580,000 people, or 1.3 percent, from December, when the previous record was set, said Agriculture Department figures.

Vermont, Alaska and South Dakota had increases of more than 5 percent. Texas had the largest enrollment, 2.984 million, down 65,000, followed by California at 2.545 million, up 43,000, and New York with 2.211 million, up 37,000.

"It is a very difficult time for low-income families and individuals and also a difficult time for the groups that serve them," said Valentine Breitbarth of Bread for the City, a group that works with poor families in Washington.

Food stamp benefits get a temporary 13 percent increase, beginning with this month, under the economic stimulus law signed by President Barack Obama. The increase equals $80 a month for a household of four.

Recent food stamp data:

Month Enrollment

September 2008 31.587 million

October 2008 31.050 million

November 2008 31.097 million

December 2008 31.784 million

January 2009 32.205 million

(Reporting by Charles Abbott and Russ Blinch; editing by Jim Marshall)"

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

But although the timeline has seemed relaxed, some 135 people have died along the way

TO BE NOTED: From Reuters:

"Madagascar: a slow-motion coup
Posted by: Giles Elgood
Tags: Africa Blog, , , , , ,

It seems Madagascar’s slow-motion coup has at last come to a head with the removal of President Marc Ravalomanana, announced almost casually in a text message from one of his aides.

The change has been a long time coming — the first outbreaks of violence were in January — and it’s all rather different from what many would regard as the traditional African coup d’etat.

Over the years that has developed into a familiar formula — the dawn announcement from a little-known colonel on national radio, the setting up of a military council to restore order after the sins of the previous regime, and the vague promise of a return to democracy in due course. The ousted leader may well have been out of the country at the time. The new boys move quickly to consolidate power.

In its final stages, the Madagascar version has been a little slower. Troops announced that they had deployed tanks but initially did not show them on the streets. Soldiers stormed the presidential palace, but the president was not at home. The central bank was seized, but the colonel in command of that operation then announced he had no more orders for the time being.

There is a sense that this is the elite fighting amongst itself for control of an island rich in natural resources and it took a while for the opposition leader, Andry Rajoelina, to gather the support he needed, particularly from the military.

But although the timeline has seemed relaxed, some 135( 135 ) people have died along the way. Even if the elephants fight slowly, the ants still get crushed."

to shift much of its remaining uninvested money into distressed debt

TO BE NOTED: From Reuters:

"
Goldman fund eyes distressed debt market: report
Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:25am EDT

(Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) is asking investors in its $15 billion private equity fund for approval to shift much of its remaining uninvested money into distressed debt, the Financial Times reported on its website late on Monday.

"Given the dislocation we are facing in the credit markets, we believe the ability to achieve private equity-like returns at an even more senior position in the capital structure provides a significant opportunity for the fund," the paper cited the bank as telling investors.

Of the $9 billion remaining in the fund, Goldman plans to allocate $4.5 billion to stressed and distressed investments and increase open market purchases of both debt and equity securities from 10 to 25 percent of total commitments, the paper said.

Another $1.5 billion will go to firms that Goldman already owns in part to help them buy their own debt, the paper said, adding that only $3 billion will go to buy-outs, originally the only mission of the fund.

Goldman has invested $2 billion in the fund, including an additional $500 million injected recently, the paper said.

In recent months, many private equity firms have quietly shifted their focus to buying debt at a discount as they are unable to pay for acquisitions with cheap flexible debt as they could during the boom years, according to the paper.

Goldman could not be immediately reached for comment by Reuters.

(Reporting by Ajay Kamalakaran in Bangalore, Editing by Ian Geoghegan)"

Japan robots hit catwalk

Japan robots hit catwalk

Mar 17 - From IT labs to photo grabs, Japanese humanoids will soon be strutting their hard- and soft-wares on the fashion catwalk. Play Video

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

That may be just as well, given the dearth of buyers and difficulty of getting financing.

TO BE NOTED: From Reuters:

Photo
1 of 1Full Size

By Paritosh Bansal and Elinor Comlay

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Bank of America Corp (BAC.N) has put a private bank it inherited from Merrill Lynch & Co on the block, and the largest U.S. bank may try to sell other assets as well.

But unlike rival Citigroup Inc (C.N), which is planning a radical overhaul, Bank of America may not need capital so badly that it has to swallow hard and sell key assets it would rather keep, industry experts said. That may be just as well, given the dearth of buyers and difficulty of getting financing.

"I haven't got the impression that they're close to doing much of anything of a reasonable size," said Jeff Harte, an analyst at Sandler O'Neill & Partners LP.

Since Citigroup last month received a second government bailout, Bank of America has tried to fend off investor fears that it could be next to need more help.

Bank of America has taken $45 billion from the government's $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, including $20 billion in a January bailout that also included the government sharing in losses on some toxic assets, mainly at Merrill. Its stock has fallen about 67 percent since the start of the year.

Last month an industry banker told Reuters that Bank of America was trying to sell First Republic Bank, which Merrill bought in 2007 for $1.8 billion. The banker did not want to be identified because the sale process is private.

Were Bank of America to need more capital, it could try to dispose of other assets such as its 16.6 percent stake in China Construction Bank Corp (601939.SS) and a nearly 50 percent interest in asset manager BlackRock Inc (BLK.N), or businesses such as asset manager Columbia Management, experts said.

Bank of America sold part of its Construction Bank shares in January for $2.83 billion, and has said it plans to sell more when a lock-up period expires in August 2010 -- but not sooner. Its stake is worth about $19 billion now.

BlackRock has a market value of around $12 billion. Columbia Management, meanwhile, said it had $386.4 billion in assets under management as of December 31. That could make it worth $7.7 billion, assuming a price of 2 percent of managed assets, which one analyst said could be used as a ballpark estimate.

Getting rid of some or all of those holdings would stop short of a true restructuring involving the offloading of capital-heavy businesses such as mortgage lender Countrywide Financial Corp and credit card issuer MBNA Corp, said Seamus McMahon, a partner in Booz & Co's banking practice.

Shedding First Republic may simply be an effort to dispose of non-core businesses rather than a bid to raise capital, he said.

"If they really want to restructure, they have got to get major lending businesses off their books," McMahon said. "This is housekeeping."

Bank of America declined to comment.

DISTANCE FROM CITI

The bank has tried to demonstrate that its financial health is better than that of Citigroup, which said in January that it will split into two operating units, selling or winding down non-core assets.

Citigroup also agreed to give a controlling stake in its Smith Barney brokerage to Morgan Stanley (MS.N) for an initial $2.7 billion payment. Morgan Stanley may take over the entire business after five years.

"Bank of America is in reasonably good condition with a strong capital base and a very positive cash flow," said Richard Bove, an analyst at Rochdale Securities. "If you believe that to be the case, there's no reason for them to do asset sales."

Still, one analyst said Bank of America may need more capital to absorb credit-related losses tied to Countrywide and Merrill.

"They have a better franchise than Citi relative to the deposit base," said Paul Miller, an analyst at FBR Capital Markets. "But they are very weak on their capital levels and they took on portfolios -- Merrill Lynch, Countrywide -- that are going to cause some problems.

"I think you're going to see more and more sales of other things throughout these next weeks," Miller added.

Unfortunately, market conditions may leave Bank of America facing the same difficulty selling assets that other financial companies, including Citigroup and the insurer American International Group Inc (AIG.N), are having.

Indeed First Republic, also a specialist in luxury home lending, may fetch a lower price than the $1.8 billion Merrill paid, experts said.

"You can justify a full price for that entity," said New York-based Park Avenue Bank Chairman Donald Glascoff, who has an expertise in real estate finance and mortgage securitization. "But I think the markets are so roiled that to find somebody who will pay a full price will be difficult."

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

But the language of the "taxpayers will make money" still irritates us

From Clusterstock:

"
Surprise: AIG Not Planning Unit Sales Anymore (AIG)
blackhole-tbi.jpg
AIG Feb 25 2009, 10:44 AM EST
0.42 Change % Change
+0.01 +3.12%
Remember when the AIG deal was first announced? We were told that the taxpayer might actually make money on it, and that while the company sold off units, us lenders would be collecting exorbitant rantes. Well the initial terms got watered down several times, and yeah, not so much on the unit sales.

Bloomberg: AIG said Sept. 16 it will sell assets to repay an $85 billion loan from the Federal Reserve. Liddy has now concluded that plan won’t work, said two people with knowledge of the matter, who declined to be identified because discussions with the government are private. AIG may hand over stakes in some operations directly to the U.S. to reduce its debt, one of the people said yesterday.

Look, we're not trying to pick on Ed Liddy. He largely inherited this mess and is trying to do best by his shareholders. What's more, our impression is that the government feels it's not really bailing out AIG, so much as it's bailing out AIG's counterparties. The best evidence for that is the company's $.50 share price.

But the language of the "taxpayers will make money" still irritates us, since that's how almost every government action has been sold to us. We'd rather they just be honest and say: Yes, the taxpayers will get hosed, but that's the price you have to pay for steps that we think are necessary to preserve civilization. And then we could judge things from there."

Me:

Don the libertarian Democrat (URL) said:
"AIG said Sept. 16 it will sell assets to repay an $85 billion loan from the Federal Reserve. Liddy has now concluded that plan won’t work"

According to Liddy, this was the plan:

"Mr Liddy pledged to press on with a wide-ranging programme of asset sales aimed at raising funds to repay the $100bn in capital injected by the government.

He said the extension of the duration of the main government loan from two to five years and the cutting of the loan’s value from $85bn to $60bn would ensure AIG did not have to dispose of businesses at fire-sale prices.

“We have more capital so we don’t have to sell good assets in bad markets,” he said. AIG has not announced a single major disposal so far, partly because potential buyers have not been able to get funding."

This Reuters post sums up the problem:

" By Paritosh Bansal

NEW YORK, Jan 12 (Reuters) - Citigroup Inc (C.N) may explore further asset sales after divesting its Smith Barney retail brokerage unit to Morgan Stanley (MS.N), but the banking giant is likely to have a tough time finding buyers.

Chief Executive Vikram Pandit is trying to shed hundreds of billions of dollars of assets and reduce risk after Citigroup suffered $20.3 billion of losses in the year ended Sept. 30. The bank is expected to post another loss for the 2008 fourth quarter when it reports results this month.

Citigroup has considered selling its Banamex Mexican banking unit and Primerica Financial Services, people close to the matter have said. The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday that CitiFinancial, international retail-brokerage operations and the private-label credit-card businesses may also be put on the block. The bank declined to comment.

But Citigroup may not find it easy to sell other assets, and like insurer American International Group Inc (AIG.N), it could run into problems disposing of units amid the financial crisis, investment bankers said. Few would-be buyers have enough cash, stocks are down, financing is not easily available, and the quality of financial assets is often suspect.

"They may quietly explore what's available. I just don't think that they can do very many deals in the near-term," said Marshall Sonenshine, chairman of New York-based investment bank Sonenshine Partners. "But over the next couple of years, they will sell a lot of those businesses, and so will AIG."

CONSUMER CREDIT

Citigroup tried to sell life insurance unit Primerica over the summer, but its plans were set back as the financial crisis took over.

Selling consumer lending businesses such as private label credit cards and CitiFinancial, which provides loans for home improvement, debt consolidation and tuition, is also likely to prove difficult in an economic downturn as consumers suffer.

In September, General Electric Co (GE.N) shelved plans to sell its $30 billion U.S. private-label credit card business, saying it was a challenging time to find someone who wanted to take responsibility for more than $30 billion of assets.

"Anything that has credit sensitivity to it, like a credit card business in this market -- Citi will be crazy to try to sell something like that," a financial services investment banker said.

"There are no strategic buyers, no financial buyers. There's no leverage," the banker said. "You are going to sell an asset that has consumer credit risk to it? Good luck."

AT WHAT PRICE?

Still, as it faces pressure to put its house in order, Citigroup may want to try, and some of its assets could lure potential buyers. But the bank will then have to deal with the problem of negotiating a good price.

"Someone's going to be interested in them at a certain price -- maybe an unappealing price to Citi's shareholders," another financial services investment banker said. "They may not get the prices they want, but you can sell things( N B )."

In some cases, uncertainty about asset quality can be addressed by a deal's structuring.

The agreement for the sale of Chevy Chase Bank to Capital One Financial Corp (COF.N) has a clause that would have Capital One pay more if the acquired bank's assets perform better than expected.

So questions about the quality of Citigroup's private-label credit card portfolio in a declining economy, for instance, could potentially be addressed by structuring a transaction where payments are made over time, with the amount depending on defaults, the banker said.

"Whether Citigroup will be better off accepting prices today or deferring sales remains to be seen," Sonenshine said. "In both cases, AIG and Citi, we are looking at the slow but inevitable disaggregation of overextended financial services companies that have demonstrated an inability to manage risk.( N B )" (Additional reporting by Dan Wilchins; editing by John Wallace) (For more M&A news and our DealZone blog, go to www.reuters.com/deals) "

Nobody trusts these businesses. They would have to sell these assets at discount prices to get anybody to bite. This plan is a non-starter because nobody will buy, and they won't sell, hoping that the government needs to keep them alive. But what if these losses are real and never come back? What if they're actually getting worse? What if nobody ever trusts them? That's why we can't risk it.

Sunday, January 11, 2009

"Islam is a religion of peace and stability. It is not a terrorism religion, and al Shabaab is Somalia's biggest threat,"

A Somalia roundup. From Reuters:

"MOGADISHU (Reuters) - Fighting between rival Somali Islamist groups and hardline insurgents on Washington's foreign terrorist list killed dozens of people north of the capital Mogadishu on Sunday, witnesses said.

An Islamist insurgency has been battling government and Ethiopian troops for the past two years, ever since Addis Ababa sent forces to oust the Islamic Courts Union from Mogadishu.

More than 16,000( 16,000 ) civilians have been killed in the insurgency, a million people have been forced from their homes and more than a third( 1/3 ) of the population depend on aid.

But an estimated 3,000 Ethiopians are now withdrawing and some Islamist factions appear to be turning on al Shabaab fighters, a hardline insurgent group that wants to impose a strict version of Islamic law traditionally shunned by Somalis( THEY DON'T WANT IT. GOOD. ).

Analysts say while the Ethiopian withdrawal could usher in a new chapter of violence, it may also be a window of opportunity to bring some Islamist groups into the political process and form a broad, inclusive government.

Witnesses said more than 20 people, mostly fighters, were killed in Sunday's battles between Hareka al Shabaab al Mujahideen, or the Mujahideen Youth Movement, and another Islamist group in Gurael, a trading town in central Somalia.

Sheikh Abdullahi Abu Yusuf, spokesman for the Islamist group Ahlu Sunna Waljamaca, said its fighters had killed 30 al Shabaab militants and seized most of their weapons.

Resident Ahmed Ali told Reuters by telephone he had seen two dead, including an al Shabaab leader, and said Ahlu Sunna Waljamaca was in control of the town after repulsing an attack.

A doctor at Istarlin hospital in Gurael said it had received 20 wounded on Sunday and more were on their way.

The fighting followed clashes a day earlier between al Shabaab rebels and moderate Islamists in Balad, 30 km (19 miles) north of Mogadishu, on Saturday.

Al Shabaab, which spearheaded attacks last year to become the face of the insurgency, is also battling Ethiopian and government soldiers elsewhere outside the capital.

While the fighting may be a struggle between Islamist groups jostling for position as the Ethiopians go, local militias angry with al Shabaab's acts are reported to be helping.

Washington accuses the group of having close ties to al Qaeda. Al Shabaab has been imposing strict sharia law on the towns it controls in southern Somalia -- banning drinking or films and beheading suspected government collaborators( WAR CRIMES ).

Ahlu Sunna Waljamaca accuses al Shabaab of hunting down and killing its religious leaders and desecrating graves.( THEY ARE AWFUL )

Somalia's interim President Sheikh Aden Madobe said on Saturday that al Shabaab was the biggest threat to stability in the Horn of Africa nation and appealed for international help to build up Somali security forces."

We should hope that al Shabaab does not take full control of Somalia, for the sake of Somalis."

And:

"Which way will Somalia go?
Posted by: David Clarke
Tags: Africa Blog, Somalia, , , , , , , , , , , ,

The withdrawal of Ethiopian troops from Somalia has left a nation beset by conflict for nearly two decades at a crossroads.

Ethiopia invaded to oust Islamists from the capital, but insurgents still control much of southern Somalia and more hardline groups that worry Washington have flourished during the two-year intervention.

The United Nations is unlikely to send peacekeepers to replace the Ethiopians. Africa is struggling to send more troops to help the 3,500 soldiers from Uganda and Burundi protecting key sites in the capital.

Some analysts say sending an international force would be counterproductive anyway as it would simply replace the Ethiopians as the hated foreign invader and maintain support for the most militant insurgents.

But without more African peacekeepers deploying soon, it seems unlikely the small and largely ineffectual existing force will remain with a weak mandate to face attacks from insurgents.

While a power vacuum may result in even more violence, some Western diplomats in the region hope it will spur the feuding Islamist opposition groups to settle their differences and work towards forming a broad-based, inclusive government.( YES )

They also hope the departure of the Ethiopians will deflate the insurgency and marginalise hardline groups imposing a strict version of Islamic law traditionally shunned by many Somalis( PLEASE ).

African diplomats pushing hard for some sort of political reconciliation say there are more and more signs of “war fatigue” among the various camps and clans.

They are consistently upbeat about Somalia’s prospects, even more so since President Abdullahi Yusuf resigned, and are reaching out to some of the hardline Islamist groups.

Western opposition to some hue of Islamist administration in Somalia — precisely what Ethiopia invaded to quash — seems to be waning as diplomats take a more pragmatic approach to the political and military reality on the ground( TRUE ).

Is there any reason for optimism after 17 years of violence?( YES )

(Picture: Somali al-Shabaab insurgents arrive in capital Mogadishu, Decemcer 27, 2008. REUTERS/Omar Faruk)"

And more:

Photo
1 of 1Full Size

By Abdiaziz Hassan

NAIROBI (Reuters) - A group of hardline Islamist fighters on Washington's list of foreign terrorists poses the biggest threat to Somalia and the government needs more support to avoid a crisis, its interim president told Reuters.

Islamist insurgents control much of southern and central Somalia and the government holds only the capital Mogadishu and the seat of parliament, Baidoa. Some 3,000 troops from Ethiopia are withdrawing after propping up the government for two years.

Western diplomats hope the insurgency will fracture when the Ethiopian soldiers finally go, and marginalise the hardline al Shabaab fighters who are imposing a strict version of Islamic law traditionally shunned by Somalis.

Speaking on Saturday in Nairobi, Somali President Sheikh Aden Madobe said the government and moderate Muslim scholars would never let al Shabaab seize power, but without help things could get worse for the Horn of Africa nation.

"Al Shabaab is supported by enemies of peace and doing something that is not Islam. Islam is a religion of peace and stability. It is not a terrorism religion, and al Shabaab is Somalia's biggest threat," Madobe said.( WELL SAID )

The hardline rebel group Hareka al Shabaab al Mujahideen, or the Mujahideen Youth Movement, is fighting Ethiopian and Somali government forces alongside other Islamist groups.

The completion of Ethiopia's pullout could help al Shabaab seize more ground, unless more moderate Islamists turn against them. The United States fears a takeover by al Shabaab and other Islamist militants it sees as linked to al Qaeda.

Madobe, who is Somalia's parliament speaker and interim president since Abdullahi Yusuf quit last month, said Somalia needed more money to build up its security forces.

"Ethiopia has decided to leave and insists on that, and we have not succeeded in forming the troops supposed to take over," he said. "Somalia is tired of chaos."

ELECTION DATE SET

The African Union said in a statement after a summit in Addis Ababa on Saturday that the international community needed to redouble commitments to help get a 10,000-strong Somali force of government and opposition soldiers up and running to support the political process.

The AU has been desperately trying to beef up its existing force of some 3,500 troops from Uganda and Burundi. But despite pledges of extra battalions from those two nations and Nigeria, they have yet to deploy. ( TOO BAD )

Analysts say unless the African Union force is strengthened soon there is a risk those peacekeepers will pull out as well, leaving even more of a security vacuum.

"The survival of this government depends on how its leadership works together, how the Somali people assist it in its task and how the international community supports it," Madobe said, before flying back to Baidoa.

He said the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) would respect the 30-day deadline in a transitional federal charter for selecting a new president.

The AU statement issued later on Saturday said the TFG and the opposition Alliance for the Re-Liberation of Somalia had agreed to hold the election process in Djibouti from January 20-26( GOOD ).

The African Union also said "significant progress" had been made on expanding the parliament to include opposition groups.( GOOD )

Madobe said so far two people had applied for president: Yusuf Azhari, a former envoy to Kenya and adviser to former president Abdullahi Yusuf, and Mohamed Deeq Abdimadar Barqadle, a member of the Somali diaspora who has been living in Sweden."

If the international community focuses on Somalia, there is some hope.