Showing posts with label Preferred Shares. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Preferred Shares. Show all posts

Saturday, May 9, 2009

There is no “correct” capital ratio for a bank – save for the need to have enough when things go bad

TO BE NOTED: From the FT:

"
Stress test jargon explained

By Stuart Kirk and Francesco Guerrera

Published: May 7 2009 18:16 | Last updated: May 7 2009 19:10

What is the US Treasury’s preferred metric in its stress tests?

The Treasury is emphasising tangible common equity, or TCE, which is considered to be the purest and most conservative measure of a bank’s financial health. It gives a picture of a bank’s liquidation value – since it is calculated by taking shareholders’ equity, and then subtracting goodwill, intangible assets and preferred shares.

What makes tangible common equity (TCE) so accurate?

TCE has the advantage of not counting preferred shares – a hybrid of debt and equity that would be of little value if a bank had to liquidate. Goodwill and intangibles are also excluded from the measure because they become worthless if a bank goes under.

What are risk-weighted assets (RWA)?

To judge a bank’s capital needs in the stress tests, the Treasury compared TCE with risk-weighted assets. Rather than treating all assets on the balance sheet equally, different asset classes are given weightings according to their perceived riskiness.

This process enables banks to hold less capital against assets considered less risky while setting aside more reserves for riskier assets. For example, corporate loans are 100 per cent risky, whereas US government bonds are given no risk weighting at all.

If many US banks have to convert preferred shares into common equity, what will happen to common shareholders and preferred shareholders?

Preferred or preference shares usually rank above common shares in the capital structure, but still behind debt holders. Preferred shares tend not to have voting rights, but holders receive a negotiated dividend that must be paid ahead of dividends to common shareholders.

If preferred investors decide to convert their holdings into common equity, they will lose their right to the preferred dividend as well as their seniority in the capital structure.

Common shareholders, on the other hand, will suffer a reduction or “dilution” in the value of the shares as the conversion of preferred shares will increase the total share count.

Why has the Treasury decided that a TCE/RWA ratio of at least 4 per cent by 2010 is adequate?

There is no “correct” capital ratio for a bank – save for the need to have enough when things go bad – nor is there an agreed way to calculate it. Before the credit crunch, banks could operate with very low capital ratios (indeed, the lower the better, because low ratios, or higher leverage, freed up capital and boosted returns). Today investors (and regulators) are insisting they have more, although the number is arbitrary.

Monday, May 4, 2009

wring capital from private investors instead of U.S. bailout funds as a way of bolstering equity without ceding control to the government

TO BE NOTED: From Bloomberg:

"Citigroup Said to Weigh Capital Boost That Averts U.S. Control

By Bradley Keoun

May 4 (Bloomberg) -- Citigroup Inc., girding for results of the Federal Reserve’s bank stress test, may try to wring capital from private investors instead of U.S. bailout funds as a way of bolstering equity without ceding control to the government, people briefed on the matter said.

Regulators have indicated to the New York-based bank, which got a $52 billion rescue last year, that another taxpayer-funded cash infusion won’t be required, according to one of the people, who asked not to be identified because the talks aren’t public. Discussions now center on how much of the government’s preferred shares in the firm must be converted into common stock, the person said. Under a plan set in February, the government would convert as much as $25 billion of its stake, for a 36 percent voting interest.

Getting money from private backers may help Citigroup dissuade the Treasury Department from converting all or part of its remaining $27 billion investment -- a step that may increase the government’s ownership to more than 50 percent and nationalize what was once the biggest U.S. bank. One likely solution for the company would be to convert $10 billion of privately held securities that could easily be added to the pending exchange, said Kevin Starke, who analyzes bank capital structures for hedge-fund clients of CRT Capital Group LLC.

“That would bring in another $10 billion of common equity, which could be enough to bring Citi over the threshold” required by regulators, said Starke, whose Stamford, Connecticut-based firm specializes in evaluating multiple classes of a company’s securities. He has no rating on Citigroup’s stock.

Government Control

Jon Diat, a Citigroup spokesman in New York, said he couldn’t comment on the stress tests. Michelle Smith, a spokeswoman for the Federal Reserve, which is overseeing the administration of the stress tests, declined to comment.

None of the largest U.S. banks has succumbed to government control, as insurer American International Group Inc. and mortgage-finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac did last year. The Treasury Department designed the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, so the government got non-voting preferred shares in exchange for bank-bailout funds.

The KBW Bank Index, which tracks the 24 biggest banking stocks, has plunged 63 percent in the past year, partly on concern that banks don’t have enough common equity, one of the most conservative measures of capital, to absorb mounting losses during a prolonged recession.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who on Feb. 10 announced a plan to test how bank balance sheets would fare under a “stress” scenario where unemployment climbs above 10 percent, says the government will ensure the 19 biggest U.S. banks get enough capital to withstand the crisis.

Tangible Common Equity

The government says it will inject additional capital where needed and consider converting TARP preferreds into common stock.

Last year, the Treasury amassed $45 billion of preferred shares in Citigroup in exchange for bailout funds and another $7 billion of preferreds for a guarantee on $301 billion of the bank’s troubled loans and bonds.

Bank of America Corp., which like Citigroup got $45 billion of bailout funds, also may wind up partially owned by the government if its TARP preferreds are converted into common.

Citigroup, beset by mortgage-bond writedowns and surging losses on credit-card loans, has recorded a $36 billion net deficit over the past six quarters, reducing its tangible common equity to $29.7 billion as of March 31.

Some investors say tangible common equity is the most reliable portion of a bank’s capital because it excludes goodwill, the intangible asset booked when a company makes acquisitions. Goodwill may have to be written off in a market where the value of acquired businesses becomes suspect.

Asset Sales

Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit, 52, has announced a plan to sell “non-core” businesses to free up capital. Last week the bank said it would get a $2.5 billion boost to tangible common equity from the sale of its Japanese brokerage, Nikko Cordial Securities.

The bank also is selling majority control of its Smith Barney brokerage to Morgan Stanley, a transaction that will add another $6.5 billion to Citigroup’s tangible common equity. That deal is scheduled to close in the third quarter.

Regulators completing the stress tests are working with banks to forecast profits and losses over the next two years. The goal is to see how much their capital would dwindle in a severe recession, and force them to address any potential shortfall. The results are scheduled to be released May 7.

Dividends, E-Trups

Under Citigroup’s plan to convert $25 billion of the government’s investment into common stock, holders of about $27 billion of privately held preferred shares also will convert their stakes. Citigroup induced the private holders to participate by suspending dividends on the preferreds -- eliminating an advantage the securities had over common stock. The bank also agreed to convert the preferreds at a premium to their market value.

Citigroup may make a similar offer to holders of about $10 billion of enhanced trust preferred securities, known as E-Trups, which rank above regular preferreds in repayment order, according to CreditSights Inc. analyst David Hendler. The E-Trups are a bond-like security whose coupon can be deferred for 10 years without triggering a default.

Markets aren’t likely to warm to a secondary stock offering, and the bank may have trouble attracting investors who aren’t already entangled, he said.

“It’s hard to get third parties involved if the investors who are already there haven’t had their pound of flesh extracted,” Hendler said. “And the next class of investors to be in that donation mode are these E-Trups holders.”

Shareholders’ Cost

Since the E-Trups are trading at 40 to 60 cents on the dollar, holders probably would come out ahead if Citigroup expands its exchange offer to include them, according to CRT’s Starke.

“They just need to open the window wider,” Starke said.

Such a deal would come at the expense of common shareholders, who already have watched the stock price tumble 95 percent since the end of 2006. Citigroup last week fell 6.9 percent in New York trading to $2.97. Under the existing conversion plan, common shareholders would be diluted by 74 percent, and the dilution would increase if additional preferred holders were invited into the exchange.

Citigroup’s E-Trups issued in December 2007 with an 8.3 percent coupon surged 12 percent last week to 61.5 cents on the dollar, according to Trace, the bond-price reporting system of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

To contact the reporter on this story: Bradley Keoun in New York at bkeoun@bloomberg.net."

Sunday, November 23, 2008

"to restore confidence in a bank that defines the term “too big to fail.”

The Citi deal. From the FT:

"
Citigroup gets $20bn bail out

By Greg Farrell in New York

Published: November 24 2008 05:14 | Last updated: November 24 2008 05:26

The US government rode to the rescue of Citigroup late Sunday, entering an agreement to backstop up to $306bn in problematic assets and injecting $20bn in capital to restore confidence in a bank that defines the term “too big to fail.”

The 11th-hour transaction, announced just before midnight on Sunday, calls for Citi to absorb the first $29bn in losses it sustains from problematic assets, and for the federal government to stand behind as much as $277bn more.

The arrangement also provides for the injection of $20bn in new capital to Citi, in return for which the bank will issue preferred shares to the government, paying dividends at a rate of 8 per cent annually."

Not unexpected. Can everyone say implicit guarantee? Add problematic assets to our list.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Citigroup On New Opportunities

From the FT, what Citigroup plans to do with the money from TARP:

"As for the government’s infusion of $25bn in capital into Citi – part of the $125bn programme announced this week requiring nine banks to issue preferred shares to the federal government in return for the new capital – Mr Crittenden said Citi had not decided how to deploy the sum.

“This represents in many ways something we had not counted on, something we hadn’t planned on,” he said. “It does present the possibility of taking advantage of opportunities that might otherwise be closed to us.”

We, the taxpayers, are so happy to help.