Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts

Sunday, March 15, 2009

My life has been a series of well-orchestrated accidents

TO BE NOTED: From the NY Times:Via Growthology:

"The Boss
For Twitter C.E.O., Well-Orchestrated Accidents

I GREW up on a farm in Nebraska, where we grew mostly corn and soybeans. During the summers I was responsible for making sure the crops were irrigated.

After high school, I enrolled at the University of Nebraska at Lincoln, but I stayed only a year and a half. I felt college was a waste of time; I wanted to start working. I moved to Florida, where I did some freelance copywriting. After that I moved to Texas and stayed with my older sister while I figured out what to do next. In 1994, I returned to Nebraska and started my first company with my dad.

We didn’t know anything about the Internet, but I thought it was going to be a big deal. We produced CD-ROMs and a video on how to use the Internet, and we did some Web hosting. I recruited some friends and we tossed around some ideas, but none of us knew how to write software and we didn’t have much money. We watched what entrepreneurs in California were doing and tried to play along.

We figured out how to create Web sites, but I didn’t want to work on other people’s projects. I had no business running a company at that time because I hadn’t worked at a real company. I didn’t know how to deal with people, I lacked focus, and I had no discipline. I’d start new projects without finishing old ones, and I didn’t keep track of money. I lost a lot of it, including what my father had invested, and I ended up owing the I.R.S. because I hadn’t paid payroll taxes. I made a lot of employees mad.

In 1997, I moved to California and worked at what is now O’Reilly Media. By 1998, I had acquired enough technical skills to do freelance Web development. In 1999, I started Pyra Labs with a friend, Meg Hourihan, to develop project management programs. Then we started a side project called Blogger, a Web publishing tool. In 2003, we sold that company to Google. I worked for Google for two years.

Several years ago I started Odeo, a podcasting company, with Noah Glass, another friend. I ran that company for 18 months. We started Twitter as a side project within Odeo during that time.

I didn’t like the direction Odeo was going. For one thing, Apple made a lot of what we worked on obsolete when it introduced podcasts into iTunes. I bought Odeo back from the investors and moved the assets to another company of mine, Obvious, a Web product development lab now on hiatus. In 2007, I sold Odeo and spun off Twitter into a separate company.

I appointed Jack Dorsey, who was engineer at Odeo, as C.E.O. of Twitter. In October 2008 it became apparent that Twitter required a day-to-day approach from a single leader. I took over as C.E.O., and Jack became chairman and assumed a more strategic position. He had worked in the courier and dispatch field, which is where he got the idea for Twitter — a social network for sending short messages to friends over cellphones and the Internet.

When people ask me when Twitter will make money, I tell them, “In due time.” They forget that we’re only 30 employees who have just gotten started. Right now, anything we would do to make money would take our time away from acquiring more users. We have patient investors.

My life has been a series of well-orchestrated accidents; I’ve always suffered from hallucinogenic optimism. I was broke for more than 10 years. I remember staying up all night one night at my first company and looking in couch cushions the next morning for some change to buy coffee. I’ve been able to pay my father back, which is nice, and my mother doesn’t worry about me as much since I got married a year and a half ago.

My wife, Sara, a designer, keeps me balanced. We’re building a modern house that we hope will be done by 2010. The design is a challenge — that’s why she’s in charge.

As told to Patricia R. Olsen."

Monday, January 26, 2009

Expect this form of disaggregation to increase… expect more non-affiliated “experts” to rise up in the blogosphere

From Shopyield, how we will obtain information going forward:

"
Twitterland

Creative destruction came to the world of information gathering and redistribution during the attacks in Mumbai, India in November.

The New York Times reported, “At the peak of the violence, more than one message per second with the word “Mumbai” in it was being posted onto Twitter, a short-message service that has evolved from an oddity to a full-fledged news platform in just two years.”

The longstanding model of American media is a one way communication pipeline with a central hub that gathers, organizes and distributes news, entertainment, sports and financial data. The central planning model of information flows.

As traditional news media channels wither (think print and evening network news) activity on new channels surges in volume and sophistication. These new channels mashup volumes of information from all participants.

It’s YouTube (GOOG), Twitter, Digg, blogs, Facebook, LinkedIn, MySpace… it’s all about the “people’s content” being gathered, organized and redistributed. I got a excellent and condensed view of the ways that social media can be integrated into business strategies at the Social Media Smarts conference organized by the Direct Marketing Association. They will be offering several more seminars in Chicago and New York on this topic in the spring.

The expanding world of social media is like the armies of Attila the Hun sweeping down to overrun the exhausted, old world media empires.

Massive clouds of the people’s content are forming and blending and who has time for traditional media?

Traditional media is joining the “social cloud” by adding social media tools … the New York Times (NYT), the Wall Street Journal (NWS), and the Financial Times have all successfully incorporated forms of social media into their web platforms. And it has enriched the user experience and increased traffic to the sites.

2009 will be an important chapter in the war between ”open” and “closed” channels of information flow.

2009 is also the year when everyone ponders how to take all this content and make new products from it.

Business models for major corporations and startups are being created and revamped in this process… social media can support marketing, customer service, product development, client acquisition, and corporate image control.

Small and large companies are creating new ways to reach their existing clients and be on the spot where communities are forming around specific interests like investing.

The Consumerist writes about Bank of America using Twitter for customer service, “Several readers have reported getting their problems solved after contacting Bank of America’s new Twitter-based rep.

One reader had tried contacting Bank of America (BAC) a dozen different times and three different ways, but one tweet to BofA_help got him in touch with executive customer service.…”

Nice… maybe Twitter will be the route to executive customer service from corporations and service providers.

Roger Ehrenberg of Information Arbitrage talks about how investment banks might approach creating and distributing equity research in an “open sourced” manner…

~~~~ “The difference between how it used to work and how it will work in the future is the disaggregation of equity research. The major securities houses will have global distribution platforms for connecting issuers and investors, and to provide markets on a worldwide basis. There will be relatively few of these players as the cost of maintaining a global distribution platform is huge and, in my opinion, a natural oligopoly. But research will be “open sourced,” as the charade sometimes called “Wall Street single-stock research” is finally exposed…” ~~~~

I’m not in agreement with Roger Ehrenberg on the “natural oligopoly” of the broker/dealers providing research and content to retail investors. Financial portals like Yahoo! Finance and MSN Money are already aggregating user generated content with “corporate content” and are where investors spend their time researching and monitoring their portfolios. They lead the markets in content and should be considered “social media” platforms.

Retail investors generally shift to broker/dealer sites when they are ready to make a trade. What could a Morgan Stanley (MS) or Schwab (SCHW) bring to the content party that other platforms aren’t providing? Broker/dealers face regulatory constraints interacting with investors that other players compensated in other ways don’t face.

Smaller market participants don’t face as many of these constraints and this helps drive disaggregation in the financial media space. Zack Miller of New Rules of Investing has developed an excellent list of the top 12 financial commenter’s or advisors who use social media … you’ll see some familiar names from Seeking Alpha…

  • Timothy Sykes: Blog, Covestor, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, subscription products
  • Jim Cramer, TheStreet.com: Blog, video, Twitter, subscription newsletter
  • John Reese, Validea: blog, SeekingAlpha, Twitter, subscription newsletter
  • Todd Sullivan: blog, SeekingAlpha, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, subscription newsletter
  • Mebane Faber: blog, SeekingAlpha, subscription research site
  • David Merkel: blog, SeekingAlpha
  • Richard Shaw, QVM Group: blog, SeekingAlpha
  • Roger Nusbaum: blogging, SeekingAlpha
  • Sean Hannon, EPIC Advisors: blogging, SeekingAlpha, Covestor
  • Chris Fernandez, PeakStocks.com: blogging, Covestor, subscription newsletter
  • Trader Mark: blogging, SeekingAlpha, Twitter
  • Zachary Scheidt: blogging, SeekingAlpha, subscription newsletter
  • Expect this form of disaggregation to increase… expect more non-affiliated “experts” to rise up in the blogosphere as economic conditions favor various industries and asset classes.( WHY CAN'T THIS BE USED TO MONITOR INVESTMENTS? )

    The much beleaguered SEC is on Twitter and recently appointed a “Director of New Media”. Expect other agencies of the federal government to follow.

    FT.com reports on the efforts large companies are making to surf the social media cloud.

    “But now a growing number of companies, including Ford Motor (F), PepsiCo (PEP), Wells Fargo (WFC) and Dell (DELL), are creating new high-level jobs to ready themselves for engagement with social media, with titles such as director of social media, head of communities and conversation, vice-president of experiential marketing and digital communications manager. The role of these new executives is to monitor and influence what is being said about their companies on the internet.

    These new jobs represent a broad shift in media relations strategy at large companies. “Corporate communications has radically changed,” says Andy Sernovitz, chief executive of the Blog Council, an organisation for heads of social media at big companies. “It’s no longer just companies talking to the press, and customer service talking to customers. All these other people showed up in the -middle. They may not be press and they may not be customers, but suddenly their collective voice is bigger than the traditional channels.”

    The essence of social media is conversation. Rather than a one-way stream of information, where companies make announcements to the press and customers, social media enables a great deal of interaction, where companies are in constant dialogue with the public. “We’ve seen a shift from doing things the old way to now having conversations with our customers,” says Jeanette Gibson, director of new media for Cisco Systems (CSCO).”

    The money quote for the new paradigm of information flows … “All these other people showed up in the -middle. They may not be press and they may not be customers, but suddenly their collective voice is bigger than the traditional channels.”

    The train has left the station. Let’s get on board with social media. It should be an excellent ride.

    Here is a great series of YouTubes from CommonCraft which gives a quick primer on the various social media platforms and tools…